The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, or the CRPD as it is commonly known, sets out explicitly that people with disabilities retain their fertility on an equal basis as others. It sets out that people with disabilities should be provided with the same quality and standard of free or affordable health care, including sexual and reproductive health.
Also, people with disabilities have the right to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of their children and to have access to age-appropriate information and education about their reproductive health. However, evidence indicates that people with disabilities face multiple barriers to fulfilling their rights.
The evidence base on family planning for women and girls with disabilities has grown rapidly over the past decade. However, there remain considerable gaps in the evidence base on good practice on increasing fully free and informed contraceptive choices for women and girls with disabilities. Although there are many organisations and projects working on this issue, interventions are often not well evaluated or documented.
Available evidence shows that for people with disabilities, pre-existing barriers to SRH have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Many long-running development programmes, including SRH, are not designed with inclusion in mind – leading to a lack of consideration of persons with disabilities in activities and monitoring and evaluation. (Buchy et al., 2017; Wapling, 2018).
Barriers can also differ depending on the types and severity of impairment and can require different solutions to access and uptake of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) services.
It is important to note that people with disabilities are not a homogenous group. Services and information need to be tailored to ensure SRHR services are accessible to women and girls with disabilities (Plan, 2017). Particular gaps in the evidence and priorities for future research include a lack of systematic examination of how interventions can best address intersecting inequalities such as:
Given these multiple barriers, most studies and experts consulted highlighted the need for a multi-component approach using a range of tailored strategies. Examples of promising practices include:
Sightsavers’ accessibility standards have helpful guidelines to help develop national accessibility standards, assess existing health infrastructure and guide the development of new health facilities.
To read more about sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) and disability inclusion, download Inclusive Futures partner SD Direct’s evidence digest here. To download the easy-read version, click here.
Inclusive Futures is attending the summit in Berlin on 2-3 April. Visit our booth or attend our panel event to connect with us and learn more about our programme insights.
Sense International has won a 2025 Zero Project Award for empowering individuals with deafblindness and complex disabilities in Kenya to build successful businesses and achieve financial independence.
Inclusive Futures and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office marked International Day of People with Disabilities by jointly hosting an event to launch the six principles for inclusive development.
Want to hear more from Inclusive Futures? Sign up to receive the latest research from our programmes and resources to help make your work inclusive of people with disabilities.
For more information see our privacy policy
Inclusive Futures are specialists and global leaders in disability and development from more than 20 global organisations.
Inclusive Futures want to give you a great experience on our website, tell as many people about our work as possible, and help change the lives of as many people as we can.